Skip to main content
SeriousAbuse of PowerSecond Term

DHS Scanned the Faces of People Watching ICE, Then Revoked Their Global Entry, a Lawsuit Says

A federal lawsuit filed in late July 2026 accuses the Department of Homeland Security of photographing, scanning, and identifying U.S. citizens who peacefully observed or protested immigration enforcement, then retaliating by stripping them of their Trusted Traveler benefits, Global Entry and TSA PreCheck.

The 55-page complaint was brought by the Electronic Privacy Information Center on behalf of three citizens. They allege DHS adopted an undisclosed policy letting ICE and CBP personnel create and keep records on people recording or protesting federal operations, even when those people had committed no crime, and then used those records to revoke their travel privileges.

One plaintiff, Nicole Cleland, was observing federal agents in Minnesota in January when an agent approached her, addressed her by name, and told her he was using facial-recognition technology. Three days later she lost her Global Entry.

The machinery here is what makes it more than a travel-perk dispute: a face scanned at a protest, matched to a name in a government database, and converted into a penalty. Using surveillance of lawful, First Amendment-protected observation to impose a consequence is retaliation against protected activity, carried out quietly through an administrative benefit most people never think of as leverage.


  • 01A federal lawsuit filed in late July 2026 accuses DHS of surveilling people who observed or protested immigration enforcement and then revoking their Global Entry and TSA PreCheck
  • 02The 55-page complaint was filed by the Electronic Privacy Information Center on behalf of three U.S. citizens
  • 03Plaintiffs allege DHS adopted an undisclosed policy letting ICE and CBP create and retain records on people recording or protesting federal operations, absent any crime
  • 04Plaintiff Nicole Cleland was told by an agent in Minnesota that he was using facial recognition on her; she lost her Global Entry three days later
  • 05The complaint frames the revocations as retaliation for First Amendment-protected observation and protest
  • 06The benefits stripped, Global Entry and TSA PreCheck, are administrative travel privileges used as leverage

Verified across 3 sources