Skip to main content
SevereAbuse of PowerSecond Term

Trump Targeted Law Firms With Executive Orders for Representing His Opponents; All Four Were Struck Down as Unconstitutional

Beginning in March 2025, Trump signed a series of executive orders targeting law firms that had previously represented his political opponents or challenged his policies. The firms targeted were Perkins Coie (which represented the Democratic Party), WilmerHale (where Special Counsel Robert Mueller was a partner), Susman Godfrey, and Jenner & Block.

The executive orders revoked security clearances for firm employees, barred them from federal contracts, and directed agencies to refuse to engage with the firms — effectively attempting to destroy their businesses as punishment for lawful legal representation. Trump openly stated his intent was retribution, calling Perkins Coie “the most evil law firm in America.”

All four executive orders were struck down by federal courts as unconstitutional violations of the First Amendment right to legal representation and due process. Judges found the orders were retaliatory and designed to chill lawyers from taking cases against the government.

In a chaotic 24-hour reversal, the DOJ initially filed to drop all appeals on March 2, 2026 — then reversed course the very next day on March 3 and announced it would continue defending the orders. The flip-flop came with no explanation, and Perkins Coie called the reversal “abrupt.” Reports suggest the White House intervened after learning DOJ was abandoning the fight. Meanwhile, nine other firms pledged $940 million in free legal work to causes the White House and the firms both said they support, rather than face similar orders (see Nine Law Firms Pledged $940 Million in Free Legal Work to Avoid Trump's Executive Orders, and Some of It Went to His Commerce Department).

The targeting of lawyers for representing clients the president dislikes strikes at the foundation of the legal system. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to counsel, and the entire adversarial system depends on lawyers being able to represent unpopular clients without government retaliation.

Correction (October 2, 2026): 3 citations (Reuters, NPR, CNN) were removed because their links are dead or could not be verified.


  • 01March 2025: Trump signed executive orders targeting four law firms that represented his opponents
  • 02WilmerHale: targeted because Special Counsel Robert Mueller was a former partner
  • 03Susman Godfrey and Jenner & Block also targeted with similar executive orders
  • 04Orders revoked security clearances, barred federal contracts, and directed agencies to refuse engagement
  • 05All four executive orders struck down by federal courts as unconstitutional
  • 06Courts found orders violated First Amendment rights and due process protections
  • 07Judges ruled orders were retaliatory and designed to chill legal representation against the government
  • 08March 2, 2026: DOJ initially filed to drop all appeals — then reversed course within 24 hours on March 3
  • 09DOJ reversal came with no explanation; reports suggest White House intervened
  • 10Nine other firms pledged $940 million in free legal work rather than face similar orders
  • 11Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to counsel — targeting lawyers undermines the entire legal system
  • 12Legal experts compared it to authoritarian regimes that punish lawyers for representing dissidents
  • 13American Bar Association condemned the orders as an attack on the rule of law

Verified across 3 sources